♥“After the pants were removed from Keloid’s body, the third witness recognized the plaid shirt... They were stripping my boy naked there in the courtroom… Semi naked Keloid was anointing the counsel table with his salt tears and snot. But it wasn’t over yet” (pg.42)
♥ This quote is important to me because it show how injustice court was and how they humiliated people.
Questons:
☺In page 31, when the tiger eats Antonio’s middle finger, why does it says that it was like losing his voice?
☺Why is chapter 2 called “the house of toast”?
Where did you get these questions?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteOh, it says that because to Antonio it was one of the ways he expressed himself to stuff and by losing it he was able to "show" it anymore.
ReplyDeletethat is said because that was a way that he was able to indicate his thoughts about certain people and without it he is unable to demonstrate it.
ReplyDeleteYaslin: You have misread the scene. Keloid is NOT the victim. There is not injustice here at all. Keloid was a thief. He lied about it. Then, because he was also stupid, he wore the things he had stolen from others into his court trial. The victims on the stand point out that Keloid is wearing something of theirs and that they can prove it -- that's why he (keloid) has to remove the items, so that they can be rightly identified. The only one to feel badly for here is Jesse (NOT KELOID!) because he is accused of being a bad "Mexican" attorney; Keloid's mother sees her son -- a true criminal -- as a "poor" victim, which he definitely is not.
ReplyDelete